Nanohoop-functionalized polymer embodiments and methods of making and using the same

ABSTRACT

Disclosed herein are embodiments of a nanohoop-functionalized polymer and methods of making and using the same. In particular embodiments, polymer comprises one or more nanohoops that extend from the polymer backbone. Also disclosed herein are polymerizable nanohoop monomer embodiments that can be used to make the polymer embodiments disclosed herein.

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This application claims the benefit of the earlier filing date of U.S.Provisional Patent Application No. 62/907,118, filed on Sep. 27, 2019;the entirety of this prior application is incorporated by referenceherein.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF GOVERNMENT SUPPORT

This invention was made with government support under Contract No.DE-SC0019017 awarded by the Department of Energy. The government hascertain rights in the invention.

FIELD

Disclosed herein are embodiments of a nanohoop-functionalized polymerand methods of making and using the same.

BACKGROUND

Over the years, polymer chemistry has enabled making polymers withcomplex architectures; however, macrocycle-based polymers are moredifficult to make and are thus far limited to using cyclodextrins.Macrocycle-based polymers have the potentiality to demonstrate distinctadvantages over polymers made up of acyclic units and have thepossibility of providing properties intrinsic to each type ofmacrocyclic unit in the polymer. There is a need in the art for newmacrocycle-based polymers, such as polymers comprisingcycloparaphenylenes, and methods of making the same.

SUMMARY

Disclosed herein are embodiments of a polymer comprising nanohoop “sidearms” that extend from a polymer backbone. Also disclosed herein arepolymerizable nanohoop monomers that can be used to make the polymerembodiments. Methods of making and using the polymer embodiments alsoare disclosed. Representative formulas for the polymer compoundembodiments are disclosed herein. In some embodiments, the polymer has astructure satisfying Formula I

wherein PB is a polymer backbone; TG is a terminating group; theoptional linker is selected from aliphatic, heteroaliphatic,haloaliphatic, haloheteroaliphatic, aromatic, or an organic functionalgroup; the nanohoop comprises six or more aromatic ring systems andwherein each aromatic ring is bound to at least two other rings of thenanohoop by two separate single covalent bonds positioned para, ortho,or meta relative to one another; m is an integer ranging from two orgreater; and q is an integer selected from 1 or 2.

Also disclosed herein are embodiments of a polymerizable nanohoopmonomer. Representative formulas for such monomers are disclosed herein.In some embodiments, the polymerizable nanohoop monomer has a structureaccording to Formula V

wherein each PFG independently is a polymerizable functional group; theoptional linker is selected from aliphatic, heteroaliphatic,haloaliphatic, haloheteroaliphatic, aromatic, or an organic functionalgroup; the nanohoop comprises six or more aromatic ring systems andwherein each aromatic ring is bound to at least two other rings of thenanohoop by two separate single covalent bonds positioned para, ortho,or meta relative to one another; and q is 1 or 2.

Representative method embodiments for making the polymerizable nanohoopmonomer embodiments, as well as the polymer embodiments, also aredisclosed herein.

The foregoing and other objects and features of the present disclosurewill become more apparent from the following detailed description, whichproceeds with reference to the accompanying figures.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 shows images illustrating that the unit cell for polymerizablenanohoop monomer 408 contains 18 CPP-NB molecules, comprising six uniquetrimers, with one trimer shown individually in two different views(image “a”) and that the unit cell for polymerizable nanohoop monomer504 contains four CPP-NB molecules (image “b”); as well as imagesshowing the norbornene alkene in the crystal structures of polymerizablenanohoop monomer 408 (image “c”) and polymerizable nanohoop monomer 504(image “d”), which illustrate that the norbornene moiety is largelyunaffected by the number of rings in the hoop.

FIG. 2 shows absorbance spectra of monomers and polymers measured inTHF, wherein exemplary CPP-NB monomers and poly-CPPs share the commonabsorbance of underivatized CPPs near 340 nm.

FIG. 3 shows fluorescence emission maxima for polymerizable nanohoopmonomer 408 (521 nm) and polymerizable nanohoop monomer 504 (462 nm),which match closely with [8]CPP (533 nm) and [10]CPP (466 nm),respectively; the insets show samples of poly[10]CPP (left) andpoly[8]CPP (right) under long-wave UV light.

FIGS. 4A and 4B show experimental and fitted data for the extinctioncoefficients measurements for polymerizable nanohoop monomer 408 (FIG.4A) and polymerizable nanohoop monomer 504 (FIG. 4B), wherein theextinction coefficients were measured in THF.

FIGS. 5A and 5B are plots showing the conversion of polymerizablenanohoop monomer 408 (FIG. 5A) and polymerizable nanohoop monomer 504(FIG. 5B) to polymer over time; wherein, based on spectra taken of roomtemperature polymerizations, both monomers were typically consumedwithin about 30 minutes.

FIG. 6 shows poly[8]CPP molecular weight values measured by gelpermeation chromatography (GPC) and dynamic light scattering (DLS) scalelinearly with the molar ratio of monomer to initiator; the dispersityvalues determined by GPC and DLS are indicated next to the respectivedata points.

FIG. 7 shows the matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI)spectrum of a sample of poly[8]CPP, which shows consistent spacing of673 Da between peaks; the number of repeat units (m) is labeledperiodically above the corresponding peaks and for this sample (with Mw7,800 Da measured by GPC and 13,100 Da measured by DLS) MALDI peaks arevisible from about 2,500 to 35,000 Da.

FIG. 8 shows stacked nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra for (i)poly[8]CPP, (ii) three random copolymers with varying ratios ofpolymerizable nanohoop monomer 408 and polymerizable nanohoop monomer504, and (iii) poly[10]CPP.

FIG. 9 shows the emission spectra and quenching response to C₆₀ of eachof the three random copolymers of FIG. 8.

FIG. 10 show fluorescence emission spectra of poly-CPPs, which showsthat a poly[8]CPP/poly[10]CPP blend exhibits characteristics of bothpoly[8]CPP and poly[10]CPP in its emission profile, whereas the emissionof poly[8]CPP-random-[10]CPP resembles the emission of poly[8]CPP.

FIG. 11 shows fluorescence quenching of poly[10]CPP by Cso, wherein thearrow indicates direction of increasing C₆₀ concentration; fluorescenceemission was measured in toluene with excitation at 340 nm and quenchingis also visibly apparent when C₆₀ is added to polymerizable nanohoopmonomer 504 or poly[10]CPP.

FIG. 12 shows that a slight decrease in fluorescence emission ofpoly[8]CPP was observed on addition of C₆₀ due to dynamic quenching, butthe emission intensity leveled off after further C₆₀ addition; lightergray traces correspond to higher concentrations of Cso.

FIGS. 13A and 13B show poly[8]CPP/poly[10]CPP blend (FIG. 13A) andpoly[8]CPP-random-[10]CPP (FIG. 13B), represented pictorially on theleft, exhibit drastically different emission profiles and responses tothe addition of Cso.

FIG. 14 is an ORTEP representation of the X-ray crystallographicstructure of intermediate 402.

FIG. 15 is an ORTEP representation of the X-ray crystallographicstructure of polymerizable nanohoop monomer 408.

FIG. 16 is an ORTEP representation of the X-ray crystallographicstructure of polymerizable nanohoop monomer 504.

FIGS. 17A-17D are proton NMR spectra (FIGS. 17A and 17C) and carbon NMRspectra (FIGS. 17B and 17D) of intermediates 402 (FIGS. 17A and 17B) and406 (FIGS. 17C and 17D).

FIGS. 18A and 18B are proton NMR spectra (FIG. 18A) and carbon NMRspectra (FIG. 18B) of polymerizable nanohoop monomer 408.

FIGS. 19A-19F are proton NMR spectra (FIGS. 19A, 19C, and 19E) andcarbon NMR spectra (FIGS. 19B, 19D, and 19F) of intermediates 510 (FIGS.19A and 19B), 500 (FIGS. 19C and 19D), and 502 (FIGS. 19E and 19F).

FIGS. 20A and 20B are proton NMR spectra (FIG. 20A) and carbon NMRspectra (FIG. 20B) of polymerizable nanohoop monomer 504.

FIGS. 21A and 21B are proton NMR spectra of polymer embodiments obtainedfrom polymerizing polymerizable nanohoop monomer 408 (FIG. 21A) andpolymerizable nanohoop monomer 504 (FIG. 21 B).

DETAILED DESCRIPTION I. OVERVIEW OF TERMS

The following explanations of terms are provided to better describe thepresent disclosure and to guide those of ordinary skill in the art inthe practice of the present disclosure. As used herein, “comprising”means “including” and the singular forms “a” or “an” or “the” includeplural references unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. Theterm “or” refers to a single element of stated alternative elements or acombination of two or more elements, unless the context clearlyindicates otherwise.

Unless explained otherwise, all technical and scientific terms usedherein have the same meaning as commonly understood to one of ordinaryskill in the art to which this disclosure belongs. Although methods andmaterials similar or equivalent to those described herein can be used inthe practice or testing of the present disclosure, suitable methods andmaterials are described below. The materials, methods, and examples areillustrative only and not intended to be limiting, unless otherwiseindicated. Other features of the disclosure are apparent from thefollowing detailed description and the claims.

Unless otherwise indicated, all numbers expressing quantities ofcomponents, molecular weights, percentages, temperatures, times, and soforth, as used in the specification or claims are to be understood asbeing modified by the term “about.” Accordingly, unless otherwiseindicated, implicitly or explicitly, the numerical parameters set forthare approximations that can depend on the desired properties soughtand/or limits of detection under standard test conditions/methods. Whendirectly and explicitly distinguishing embodiments from discussed priorart, the embodiment numbers are not approximates unless the word “about”is recited. Furthermore, not all alternatives recited herein areequivalents.

To facilitate review of the various embodiments of the disclosure, thefollowing explanations of specific terms are provided. Certainfunctional group terms include a symbol “—” which is used to show howthe defined functional group attaches to, or within, the compound towhich it is bound. Also, a dashed bond (i.e., “———”) as used in certainformulas described herein indicates an optional bond (that is, a bondthat may or may not be present). A person of ordinary skill in the artwould recognize that the definitions provided below and the compoundsand formulas included herein are not intended to include impermissiblesubstitution patterns (e.g., methyl substituted with 5 different groups,and the like). Such impermissible substitution patterns are easilyrecognized by a person of ordinary skill in the art. In formulas andcompounds disclosed herein, a hydrogen atom is present and completes anyformal valency requirements (but may not necessarily be illustrated)wherever a functional group or other atom is not illustrated. Forexample, a phenyl ring that is drawn as

comprises a hydrogen atom attached to each carbon atom of the phenylring other than the “a” carbon, even though such hydrogen atoms are notillustrated. Any functional group disclosed herein and/or defined abovecan be substituted or unsubstituted, unless otherwise indicated herein.

Acyl Halide: —C(O)X, wherein X is a halogen, such as Br, F, I, or Cl.

Aldehyde: —C(O)H.

Aliphatic: A hydrocarbon group having at least one carbon atom to 50carbon atoms (C₁₋₅₀), such as one to 25 carbon atoms (C₁₋₂₅), or one toten carbon atoms (C₁₋₁₀), and which includes alkanes (or alkyl), alkenes(or alkenyl), alkynes (or alkynyl), including cyclic versions thereof,and further including straight- and branched-chain arrangements, and allstereo and position isomers as well. An aliphatic group is distinct froman aromatic group.

Aliphatic-aromatic: An aromatic group that is or can be coupled to acompound disclosed herein, wherein the aromatic group is or becomescoupled through an aliphatic group.

Aliphatic-aryl: An aryl group that is or can be coupled to a compounddisclosed herein, wherein the aryl group is or becomes coupled throughan aliphatic group.

Aliphatic-heteroaryl: A heteroaryl group that is or can be coupled to acompound disclosed herein, wherein the heteroaryl group is or becomescoupled through an aliphatic group.

Alkenyl: An unsaturated monovalent hydrocarbon having at least twocarbon atom to 50 carbon atoms (C₂₋₅₀), such as two to 25 carbon atoms(C₂₋₂₅), or two to ten carbon atoms (C₂₋₁₀), and at least onecarbon-carbon double bond, wherein the unsaturated monovalenthydrocarbon can be derived from removing one hydrogen atom from onecarbon atom of a parent alkene. An alkenyl group can be branched,straight-chain, cyclic (e.g., cycloalkenyl), cis, or trans (e.g., E orZ).

Alkoxy: —O-aliphatic, such as —O-alkyl, —O-alkenyl, —O-alkynyl; withexemplary embodiments including, but not limited to, methoxy, ethoxy,n-propoxy, isopropoxy, n-butoxy, t-butoxy, sec-butoxy, n-pentoxy(wherein any of the aliphatic components of such groups can comprise nodouble or triple bonds, or can comprise one or more double and/or triplebonds).

Alkyl: A saturated monovalent hydrocarbon having at least one carbonatom to 50 carbon atoms (C₁₋₅₀), such as one to 25 carbon atoms (C₁₋₂₅),or one to ten carbon atoms (C₁₋₁₀), wherein the saturated monovalenthydrocarbon can be derived from removing one hydrogen atom from onecarbon atom of a parent compound (e.g., alkane). An alkyl group can bebranched, straight-chain, or cyclic (e.g., cycloalkyl).

Alkynyl: An unsaturated monovalent hydrocarbon having at least twocarbon atom to 50 carbon atoms (C₂₋₅₀), such as two to 25 carbon atoms(C₂₋₂₅), or two to ten carbon atoms (C₂₋₁₀), and at least onecarbon-carbon triple bond, wherein the unsaturated monovalenthydrocarbon can be derived from removing one hydrogen atom from onecarbon atom of a parent alkyne. An alkynyl group can be branched,straight-chain, or cyclic (e.g., cycloalkynyl).

Amide: —C(O)NR^(a)R^(b) or —NR^(a)C(O)R^(b) wherein each of R^(a) andR^(b) independently is selected from hydrogen, aliphatic,heteroaliphatic, haloaliphatic, haloheteroaliphatic, aromatic, or anorganic functional group.

Amino: —NR^(a)R^(b), wherein each of R^(a) and R^(b) independently isselected from hydrogen, aliphatic, heteroaliphatic, haloaliphatic,haloheteroaliphatic, aromatic, or an organic functional group.

Aromatic: A cyclic, conjugated group or moiety of, unless specifiedotherwise, from 5 to 15 ring atoms having a single ring (e.g., phenyl)or multiple condensed rings in which at least one ring is aromatic(e.g., naphthyl, indolyl, or pyrazolopyridinyl); that is, at least onering, and optionally multiple condensed rings, have a continuous,delocalized Tr-electron system. Typically, the number of out of planeTr-electrons corresponds to the HOckel rule (4n +2). The point ofattachment to the parent structure typically is through an aromaticportion of the condensed ring system. For example,

However, in certain examples, context or express disclosure may indicatethat the point of attachment is through a non-aromatic portion of thecondensed ring system. For example,

An aromatic group or moiety may comprise only carbon atoms in the ring,such as in an aryl group or moiety, or it may comprise one or more ringcarbon atoms and one or more ring heteroatoms comprising a lone pair ofelectrons (e.g. S, O, N, P, or Si), such as in a heteroaryl group ormoiety. Aromatic groups may be substituted with one or more groups otherthan hydrogen, such as aliphatic, heteroaliphatic, haloaliphatic,haloheteroaliphatic, aromatic, or an organic functional group.

Aryl: An aromatic carbocyclic group comprising at least five carbonatoms to 15 carbon atoms (C₅-C₁₅), such as five to ten carbon atoms(C₅-C₁₀), having a single ring or multiple condensed rings, whichcondensed rings can or may not be aromatic provided that the point ofattachment to a remaining position of the compounds disclosed herein isthrough an atom of the aromatic carbocyclic group. Aryl groups may besubstituted with one or more groups other than hydrogen, such asaliphatic, heteroaliphatic, haloaliphatic, haloheteroaliphatic,aromatic, or an organic functional group.

Aroxy: —O-aromatic.

Azo: -N═NR^(a) wherein R^(a) is hydrogen, aliphatic, heteroaliphatic,haloaliphatic, haloheteroaliphatic, aromatic, or an organic functionalgroup.

Carbamate: —OC(O)NR^(a)R^(b), wherein each of R^(a) and R^(b)independently is selected from hydrogen, aliphatic, heteroaliphatic,haloaliphatic, haloheteroaliphatic, aromatic, or an organic functionalgroup.

Carboxyl: —C(O)OH.

Carboxylate: —C(O)O⁻ or salts thereof, wherein the negative charge ofthe carboxylate group may be balanced with an M⁺ counterion, wherein M⁺may be an alkali ion, such as K⁺, Na⁺, Li⁺; an ammonium ion, such as⁺N(R^(b))₄. where R^(b) is H, aliphatic, heteroaliphatic, haloaliphatic,haloheteroaliphatic, or aromatic; or an alkaline earth ion, such as[Ca²⁺]_(0.5), [Mg²⁺]_(0.5), or [Ba²⁺]_(0.5).

Cyano: —CN.

Disulfide: —SSR^(a), wherein R^(a) is selected from hydrogen, aliphatic,heteroaliphatic, haloaliphatic, haloheteroaliphatic, aromatic, or anorganic functional group.

Dithiocarboxylic: —C(S)SR^(a) wherein R^(a) is selected from hydrogen,aliphatic, heteroaliphatic, haloaliphatic, haloheteroaliphatic,aromatic, or an organic functional group.

Electron-Accepting Group (EAG): A functional group capable of acceptingelectron density from the ring to which it is directly attached, such asby inductive electron withdrawal.

Electron-Donating Group (EDG): A functional group capable of donating atleast a portion of its electron density into the ring to which it isdirectly attached, such as by resonance.

Ester: —C(O)OR^(a) or —OC(O)R^(a), wherein R^(a) is selected fromaliphatic, heteroaliphatic, haloaliphatic, haloheteroaliphatic,aromatic, or an organic functional group.

Ether: -aliphatic-O-aliphatic, -aliphatic-O-aromatic,-aromatic-O-aliphatic, or -aromatic-O-aromatic.

Halo (or halide or halogen): Fluoro, chloro, bromo, or iodo.

Haloaliphatic: An aliphatic group wherein one or more hydrogen atoms,such as one to 10 hydrogen atoms, independently is replaced with ahalogen atom, such as fluoro, bromo, chloro, or iodo.

Haloaliphatic-aryl: An aryl group that is or can be coupled to acompound disclosed herein, wherein the aryl group is or becomes coupledthrough a haloaliphatic group.

Haloaliphatic-heteroaryl: A heteroaryl group that is or can be coupledto a compound disclosed herein, wherein the heteroaryl group is orbecomes coupled through a haloaliphatic group.

Haloalkyl: An alkyl group wherein one or more hydrogen atoms, such asone to 10 hydrogen atoms, independently is replaced with a halogen atom,such as fluoro, bromo, chloro, or iodo. In an independent embodiment,haloalkyl can be a CX₃ group, wherein each X independently can beselected from fluoro, bromo, chloro, or iodo.

Heteroaliphatic: An aliphatic group comprising at least one heteroatomto 20 heteroatoms, such as one to 15 heteroatoms, or one to 5heteroatoms, which can be selected from, but not limited to oxygen,nitrogen, sulfur, silicon, boron, selenium, phosphorous, and oxidizedforms thereof within the group. Alkoxy, ether, amino, disulfide, peroxy,and thioether groups are exemplary (but non-limiting) examples ofheteroaliphatic.

Heteroaliphatic-aryl: An aryl group that is or can be coupled to acompound disclosed herein, wherein the aryl group is or becomes coupledthrough a heteroaliphatic group.

Heteroaryl: An aryl group comprising at least one heteroatom to sixheteroatoms, such as one to four heteroatoms, which can be selectedfrom, but not limited to oxygen, nitrogen, sulfur, silicon, boron,selenium, phosphorous, and oxidized forms thereof within the ring. Suchheteroaryl groups can have a single ring or multiple condensed rings,wherein the condensed rings may or may not be aromatic and/or contain aheteroatom, provided that the point of attachment is through an atom ofthe aromatic heteroaryl group. Heteroaryl groups may be substituted withone or more groups other than hydrogen, such as aliphatic,heteroaliphatic, haloaliphatic, haloheteroaliphatic, aromatic, or anorganic functional group.

Heteroatom: An atom other than carbon or hydrogen, such as (but notlimited to) oxygen, nitrogen, sulfur, silicon, boron, selenium, orphosphorous. In particular disclosed embodiments, such as when valencyconstraints do not permit, a heteroatom does not include a halogen atom.

Ketone: —C(O)R^(a), wherein R^(a) is selected from aliphatic,heteroaliphatic, haloaliphatic, haloheteroaliphatic, aromatic, or anorganic functional group.

Nanohoop: A compound comprising linked rings, such as linked aromaticrings (or groups), that are organized to form a hoop-like structure. Insome embodiments, the rings can be linked in a para-, ortho-, ormeta-substituted manner, or other positional manner. In someembodiments, the rings of the nanohoop skeleton are all linked in apara-substituted manner such that the bonds connecting each ring to twoother rings of the nanohoop compound are para-substituted relative toeach other. In some additional embodiments, at least one ring of thenanohoop skeleton is linked in a meta-substituted manner such that thebonds connecting this ring to two other rings of the nanohoop compoundare meta-substituted relative to each other.

Organic Functional Group: A functional group that may be provided by anycombination of aliphatic, heteroaliphatic, aromatic, haloaliphatic,and/or haloheteroaliphatic groups, or that may be selected from, but notlimited to, aldehyde; aroxy; acyl halide; halogen; nitro; cyano; azide;carboxyl (or carboxylate); amide; ketone; carbonate; imine; azo;carbamate; hydroxyl; thiol; sulfonyl (or sulfonate); oxime; ester;thiocyanate; thioketone; thiocarboxylic acid; thioester;dithiocarboxylic acid or ester; phosphonate; phosphate; silyl ether;sulfinyl; thial; or combinations thereof.

Oxime: —CR^(a)═NOH, wherein R^(a) is hydrogen, aliphatic,heteroaliphatic, haloaliphatic, haloheteroaliphatic, aromatic, or anorganic functional group.

Peroxy: —O—OR^(a) wherein R^(a) is hydrogen, aliphatic, heteroaliphatic,haloaliphatic, haloheteroaliphatic, aromatic, or an organic functionalgroup.

Phosphate: —O—P(O)(OR^(a))₂, wherein each R^(a) independently ishydrogen, aliphatic, heteroaliphatic, haloaliphatic,haloheteroaliphatic, aromatic, or an organic functional group; orwherein one or more R^(a) groups are not present and the phosphate grouptherefore has at least one negative charge, which can be balanced by acounterion, M⁺, wherein each M⁺ independently can be an alkali ion, suchas K⁺, Na⁺, Li⁺; an ammonium ion, such as ⁺N(R^(b))₄. where R^(b) is H,aliphatic, heteroaliphatic, haloaliphatic, haloheteroaliphatic, oraromatic; or an alkaline earth ion, such as [Ca²⁺]_(0.5), [Mg²⁺]_(0.5),or [Ba²⁺]_(0.5).

Phosphonate: —P(O)(OR^(a))₂, wherein each R^(a) independently ishydrogen, aliphatic, heteroaliphatic, haloaliphatic,haloheteroaliphatic, aromatic, or an organic functional group; orwherein one or more R^(a) groups are not present and the phosphate grouptherefore has at least one negative charge, which can be balanced by acounterion, M³⁰ , wherein each M³⁰ independently can be an alkali ion,such as K⁺, Na⁺, Li⁺; an ammonium ion, such as ⁺N(R^(b))₄. where R^(b)is H, aliphatic, heteroaliphatic, haloaliphatic, haloheteroaliphatic, oraromatic; or an alkaline earth ion, such as [Ca²⁺]_(0.5), [Mg²⁺]_(0.5),or [Ba²⁺]_(0.5).

Quaternary Amine: —N⁺R^(b)R^(c)R^(d), wherein each of R^(b), R^(c), andR^(d) independently are selected from hydrogen, aliphatic,heteroaliphatic, aryl, heteroaryl, and any combination thereof.

Silyl Ether: —OSi R^(a)R^(b), wherein each of R^(a) and R^(b)independently is selected from hydrogen, aliphatic, heteroaliphatic,haloaliphatic, haloheteroaliphatic, aromatic, or an organic functionalgroup.

Sulfinyl: —S(O)R^(a), wherein R^(a) is selected from hydrogen,aliphatic, heteroaliphatic, haloaliphatic, haloheteroaliphatic,aromatic, or an organic functional group.

Sulfonyl: —SO₂R^(a), wherein R^(a) is selected from hydrogen, aliphatic,heteroaliphatic, haloaliphatic, haloheteroaliphatic, aromatic, or anorganic functional group.

Sulfonamide: —SO₂NR^(a)R^(b) or —N(R^(a))SO₂R^(b), wherein each of R^(a)and R^(b) independently is selected from hydrogen, aliphatic,heteroaliphatic, haloaliphatic, haloheteroaliphatic, aromatic, or anorganic functional group.

Sulfonate: —SO₃ ⁻, wherein the negative charge of the sulfonate groupmay be balanced with an M⁺ counter ion, wherein M⁺ may be an alkali ion,such as K⁺, Na³⁰ , Li⁺; an ammonium ion, such as ⁺N(R^(b))₄. where R^(b)is H, aliphatic, heteroaliphatic, haloaliphatic, haloheteroaliphatic, oraromatic; or an alkaline earth ion, such as [Ca²⁺]_(0.5), [Mg²⁺]_(0.5),or [Ba²⁺]_(0.5).

Thial: —C(S)H.

Thiocarboxylic acid: —C(O)SH, or —C(S)OH.

Thiocyanate: —S—CN or —N═C═S.

Thioester: —C(O)SR^(a) or —C(S)OR^(a) wherein R^(a) is selected fromhydrogen, aliphatic, heteroaliphatic, haloaliphatic,haloheteroaliphatic, aromatic, or an organic functional group.

Thioether: —S-aliphatic or —S-aromatic, such as —S-alkyl, —S-alkenyl,—S-alkynyl, —S-aryl, or —S-heteroaryl; or -aliphatic-S-aliphatic,-aliphatic-S-aromatic, -aromatic-S-aliphatic, or -aromatic-S-aromatic.

Thioketone: —C(S)R^(a) wherein R^(a) is selected from hydrogen,aliphatic, heteroaliphatic, haloaliphatic, haloheteroaliphatic,aromatic, or an organic functional group.

II. INTRODUCTION

To date, one class of macrocycles that has never been incorporated intopolymers is the nanohoop class of compounds (e.g., cycloparaphenylenes,or “CPPs” or “[n]CPPs”). For example, cycloparaphenylenes, which arecomprised of n benzene rings linked end-to-end in the para position, arestrained cyclic molecules can be thought of as the shortest fragments ofarmchair carbon nanotubes (CNTs). Unique photophysical properties arisefrom bending benzene into a hoop shape in this manner. For example,unlike in their linear counterparts, the HOMO-LUMO energy gap of CPPsdecreases as the number of linked benzene rings decreases. This trend isalso reflected in the red-shifting fluorescence emission as the hoopsize decreases. For example, [12]CPP has an emission maximum at 450 nmwhile [7]CPP emits at 587 nm. In some embodiments, CPPs share anabsorbance maximum near 340 nm. Distortion of the phenyl rings in CPPscan disrupt pi-pi interactions among macrocycles, allowing CPPs with,e.g., 12 or more unsubstituted phenyl rings, to be readily soluble incommon organic solvents. CPPs also can comprise finely-tunable porediameters and resultant supramolecular interactions. Disclosed hereinpolymer embodiments comprising one or more nanohoop compounds thatextend as “side arms” from the polymer. The polymer embodimentsdisclosed herein have controlled molecular weights, moderatedispersities, and high degrees of polymerization. Also disclosed hereinare polymerizable nanohoop monomer embodiments that can be used astemplates for polymerization to provide polymer embodiments disclosedherein.

III. POLYMER EMBODIMENTS

Disclosed herein are embodiments of a polymer comprising a polymerbackbone functionalized with one or more nanohoop compounds that arecovalently attached to the polymer backbone, but do not make up thepolymer backbone. In other words, the nanohoop compounds can extend fromthe polymer backbone as “side arms.” In particular embodiments, thenanohoop is not linearly conjugated with the polymer backbone, but itstill exhibits radial conjugation with ring systems that make up thenanohoop. In some embodiments, the polymer has a structure satisfyingFormula I below.

With reference to Formula I, the PB group represents the polymerbackbone of the polymer (e.g., a polymer backbone formed frompolymerization methods disclosed herein and/or a polymer backbone formedfrom norbornenes, acrylates, methacrylates, methyacrylamides, stryenes,dienes, vinyl acetate, n-vinylpyrrolidone, aldehydes, epoxides,acrylonitriles, cyanoacrylates, alcohols, carboxylic acids, amines,ethers, or the like); “TG” represents a terminating group; the optionallinker can be a linker selected from aliphatic, heteroaliphatic,haloaliphatic, haloheteroaliphatic, aromatic, or an organic functionalgroup; the nanohoop can be a nanohoop comprising any suitable number ofaromatic ring systems wherein each aromatic ring system is bound to atleast two other ring systems of the nanohoop through two separate singlecovalent bonds that are positioned para, ortho, or meta relative to oneanother

m is an integer ranging from two or greater such as 2 to 10,000 orgreater, or 2 to 1000 or greater, or 2 to 100 or greater, or the like;and q is an integer selected from 1 or 2. In some embodiments, thenanohoop comprises 6 or more aromatic ring systems (e.g., 6 to 100aromatic ring systems, or 6 to 50, or 6 to 25, or 6 to 15, or 6 to 10aromatic ring systems). In some embodiments, the nanohoop compounds canbe covalently attached to the polymer backbone through one point ofattachment (such as through one carbon atom of a ring of the nanohoopcompound), or through two points of attachments (such as through twoadjacent carbon atoms of a five-membered ring attached to an aromaticring system of the nanohoop compound). Also, the nanohoop can becovalently attached to two different polymer backbones (as representedby q being 2). In some embodiments, each of the PB and TG groupsindependently comprise aliphatic, heteroaliphatic, haloaliphatic,haloheteroaliphatic, aromatic, or organic functional groups. In someembodiments, the polymer can have a structure satisfying Formula II.

With reference to Formula II, each of rings A, B, C, D, and Eindependently are aromatic ring systems; each R′ independently is asubstituent other than hydrogen; each s independently is an integerselected from 0 to 10, such as 0 to 5, or 1 to 5, or 1 to 4, or 1 to 3;each p independently is an integer selected from 1 to 1000, such as 1 to500, or 1 to 250, or 1 to 100, or 2 to 10; and each of TG, PB, optionallinker, and m can be as recited above for Formula I. In someembodiments, rings A, B, C, D, and E can be bound to the other rings ofthe nanohoop by para, meta, or ortho linkages. In some embodiments, eachof rings B, C, D, E, F, and G independently can be an aryl (e.g.,phenyl) or heteroaryl group (e.g., pyridinyl). In particularembodiments, each of rings B, C, D, E, F, and G independently can bephenyl. In some embodiments, each R′ independently can be aliphatic,heteroaliphatic, haloaliphatic, aromatic, or an organic functionalgroup. In some embodiments, the PB group can comprise a five-memberedring fused to ring A that also comprises two carbon atoms that arefunctionalized with aliphatic groups. In some embodiments, TG is anaromatic ring (e.g., phenyl). In some embodiments, p is 1, 2, 3, 4, 5,6, 7, 8, 9, or 10.

In some embodiments, the polymer can have a structure satisfying FormulaIII or IV, illustrated below.

With reference to Formulas III and IV, TG, each R′, m, each p, and eachs independently can be as recited for any one or more of the formulasdescribed above. In some embodiments, TG is phenyl; the optional linker,if present, is aliphatic, heteroaliphatic, or aromatic; each R′independently is aliphatic, aryl, heteroaryl, halogen, anelectron-accepting group, an electron-donating group, or any combinationthereof; each s independently is 0 or 1; and p is 4 or 6.

Representative polymer embodiments are illustrated below.

Also disclosed herein are polymerizable nanohoop monomers that can beused to make the polymer embodiments described above. In someembodiments, the polymerizable nanohoop monomers have a structuresatisfying Formula V.

With reference to Formula V, the PFG group represents a polymerizablefunctional group (e.g., norbornenes, acrylates, methacrylates,methyacrylamides, stryenes, dienes, vinyl acetate, n-vinylpyrrolidone,aldehydes, epoxides, acrylonitriles, cyanoacrylates, alcohols,carboxylic acids, amines, ethers, or the like); the optional linker canbe a linker selected from aliphatic, heteroaliphatic, haloaliphatic,haloheteroaliphatic, aromatic, or an organic functional group; thenanohoop can be a nanohoop comprising any suitable number of aromaticring systems wherein each aromatic ring system is bound to at least twoother ring systems of the nanohoop through two separate single covalentbonds that are positioned para, ortho, or meta relative to one another

and q is an integer selected from 1 or 2. In some embodiments, thenanohoop comprises 6 or more aromatic ring systems (e.g., 6 to 100, or 6to 50, or 6 to 25, or 6 to 15, or 6 to 10, aromatic ring systems). Insome embodiments, the nanohoop compounds can be covalently attached tothe PFG through one point of attachment (such as through one carbon atomof a ring of the nanohoop compound), or through two points ofattachments (such as through two adjacent carbon atoms of afive-membered ring attached to an aromatic ring system of the nanohoopcompound). Also, the nanohoop can be covalently attached to twodifferent PFGs (as represented by q being 2).

In some embodiments, the polymerizable nanohoop monomer can have astructure satisfying Formula VI.

With reference to Formula VI, each of rings A, B, C, D, and Eindependently are aromatic ring systems; each R′ independently is asubstituent other than hydrogen; each s independently is an integerselected from 0 to 10, such as 0 to 5, or 1 to 5, or 1 to 4, or 1 to 3;p is an integer selected from 1 to 1000 (e.g., 1 to 500, or 1 to 250, or1 to 100, or 1 to 10, or 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, or 10); and the PFG,the optional linker, and q can be as recited above for Formula V. Insome embodiments, rings A, B, C, D, and E can be bound to the otherrings of the nanohoop by para, meta, or ortho linkages. In someembodiments, each of rings B, C, D, E,

F, and G independently can be an aryl (e.g., phenyl) or heteroaryl group(e.g., pyridinyl). In particular embodiments, each of rings B, C, D, E,F, and G independently can be phenyl. In some embodiments, each R′independently can be aliphatic, heteroaliphatic, haloaliphatic,aromatic, or an organic functional group. In some embodiments, the PFGcan comprise a bicyclic structure comprising at least one double bondand may be bound directly to ring A through a single bond or by beingfused to ring A, or may be bound indirectly to ring A through theoptional linker group. In some embodiments, the PFG is a norbornene ringsystem and is fused to ring A. In some embodiments, q is 1 and p is 2 or3.

In some embodiments, the polymer can have a structure satisfying FormulaVII or VIII, illustrated below.

With reference to Formulas VII and VIII, each R′, each s, and pindependently can be as recited for any one or more of the formulasdescribed above. In some embodiments, the optional linker, if present,is aliphatic or aromatic; each R′ independently is aliphatic, aryl,heteroaryl, halogen, an electron-accepting group, an electron-donatinggroup, or any combination thereof; each s independently is 0 or 1; and pis 4 or 6.

Representative polymerizable nanohoop monomer embodiments areillustrated below.

IV. METHOD EMBODIMENTS

Also disclosed herein are embodiments of a method for making thenanohoop-functionalized polymer embodiments. In some embodiments, themethod comprises polymerizing one or more polymerizable nanohoopmonomers to provide a polymer backbone from which the nanohoops extend.In particular embodiments, a polymerizable nanohoop monomer comprisesone or more polymerizable functional groups. In some such embodiments,the one or more polymerizable functional groups can be bound to the sameindividual aromatic ring of the nanohoop, or they can be bound todifferent aromatic rings of the nanohoop. In particular embodiments, atleast one polymerizable functional group is attached to at least onearomatic ring of the nanohoop. In yet some other particular embodiments,two or more polymerizable functional groups are attached to at least onearomatic ring of the nanohoop.

In some embodiments, polymerization can comprise polymerizing the samepolymerizable nanohoop monomer to provide a homopolymer comprising apolymer backbone attached to a plurality of nanohoops that extend fromthe polymer backbone. In yet some additional embodiments, polymerizationcan comprise polymerizing different polymerizable nanohoop monomerembodiments to provide a heteropolymer comprising a polymer backboneattached to a plurality of different nanohoops wherein at least twonanohoops are different from one another. In yet some additionalembodiments, heteropolymer embodiments can comprise a polymer backbonethat is made from different polymerizable nanohoop monomers that differin the identity of their polymermizable functional groups.Polymerization typically takes place by forming bonds between thepolymerizable functional groups of the polymerizable nanohoop monomers.

In some embodiments, the method comprises using a polymerization methodselected from a ring opening metathesis polymerization method (or ROMP),a reversible addition-fragmentation chain transfer (or RAFT) method, ananionic polymerization method, or a condensation polymerization method.Other suitable polymerization methods also can be used as long as theydo not disrupt the structural integrity of the nanohoops.

In some embodiments, the method is a ROMP method and comprises exposingone or more polymerizable nanohoop monomers to a catalyst capable ofpromoting covalent bond formation between the polymerizable functionalgroups of the polymerizable nanohoop monomers to thereby provide apolymer backbone, as illustrated in Scheme 1. In some embodiments, thecatalyst also can serve as a source for a terminating group that becomesbound to one end of the polymer during polymerization. In someembodiments, chemical bonds (e.g., carbon-carbon double bonds) of apolymerizable functional group can be broken and can then bind withother reactive polymerizable functional groups of other polymerizablenanohoop monomers to thereby form the polymer backbone. In someembodiments, at least one of the polymerizable functional groups can becovalently attached to a terminating group, which can be provided by thecatalyst used for polymerization, or by a terminating reagent. Arepresentative ROMP method is illustrated below in Scheme 1.

With reference to compounds 100 and 102 shown in Scheme 1, each of ringsA-E are aromatic groups as defined herein for Formulas II or VI; PFG isa polymerizable functional group; the optional linker is linker groupselected from an aliphatic group, a heteroaliphatic group, an aromaticgroup, an organic functional group, or any combination thereof; p is 1to 1000 (such as 1 to 500, or 1 to 250, or 1 to 100); TG represents aterminating group; PB represents the polymer backbone provided aspolymerization takes place; and m is an integer ranging from 2 orgreater (e.g., 2 to 10,000 or greater, or 2 to 1000 or greater, or 2 to100 or greater, or the like). In some embodiments, the catalyst can be acatalyst capable of promoting ROMP, such as an alkylidene catalyst(e.g., a ruthenium alkylidene catalyst like bromopyridyl Grubbs G3, orother Grubbs catalysts).

In a representative ROMP method, a norbornene group can be used as apolymerizable functional group. When the norbornene group is exposed toan alkylidene catalyst (e.g., a ruthenium-based Grubbs catalyst, such asbromopyridyl Grubbs G3 catalyst 202 shown in Scheme 2), the double bondof the norbornene ring system is broken and the carbon atoms of thedouble bond each form a new double bond to thereby providing alkenelinking groups that make-up the polymer backbone (e.g., see compound 204in Scheme 2). In some embodiments, at least one of the carbon atoms ofthe norbornene group becomes covalently attached to a terminating groupprovided by the catalyst. Representative ROMP methods are shown in

Scheme 2.

In other embodiments, the method can be a RAFT polymerization method. Insuch embodiments, polymerizable functional groups of the polymerizablenanohoop monomer(s) can be bound together to form a polymer backbone byreacting the polymerizable nanohoop monomers with a radical source and aRAFT agent. The radical source can be an initiator compound, such asazobisisobutyronitrile (AIBN) or 4,4′-azobis(4-cyanovaleric acid)(ACVA). The RAFT agent can be a dithioester having a structuresatisfying a formula R^(a)C(═S)SR^(b) (wherein each of R^(a) and R^(b)independently can be selected from aliphatic, aromatic, or combinationsthereof); a thiocarbamate having a structure satisfying a formulaR^(a)OC(═S)NR^(b)R^(c) or R^(a)SC(═O)NRbRc (wherein each of R^(a),R^(b), and R^(c) independently can be selected from hydrogen, aliphatic,heteroaliphatic, aromatic, or combinations thereof); a dithiocarbamatehaving a structure satisfying a formula R^(a)SC(═S)NR^(b)R^(c) (whereineach of R^(a), R^(b), and R^(c) independently can be selected fromhydrogen, aliphatic, heteroaliphatic, aromatic, or combinationsthereof); a trithiocarbonate having a structure satisfying a formulaR^(a)SC(═S)SR^(b) (wherein each of R^(a) and R^(b) independently can beselected from hydrogen, aliphatic, heteroaliphatic, aromatic, orcombinations thereof); a dithiocarbonate having a structure satisfying aformula R^(a)OC(═S)SR^(b) or R^(a)SC(═S)OR^(b) (wherein each of R^(a)and R^(b) independently can be selected from hydrogen, aliphatic,heteroaliphatic, aromatic, or combinations thereof); a xanthate having astructure satisfying a formula R^(a)OC(═S)SM⁺ (wherein R^(a) isaliphatic, aromatic, or a combination thereof and M is a counterionhaving a +1 charge, such as sodium, potassium, ammonium, or the like);or a xanthate ester having a structure satisfying a formulaR^(a)OC(═S)SR^(b) (wherein each of R^(a) and R^(b) independently can beselected from aliphatic, aromatic, or combinations thereof).Polymerizable functional groups that can be used in such embodiments caninclude, but are not limited to, acrylates, methacrylates (e.g.,methyacrylate), methyacrylamides, stryenes, dienes (e.g., butadiene andderivatives thereof), vinyl acetate, n-vinylpyrrolidone, aldehydes,epoxides, acrylonitriles, and cyanoacrylates. Such polymerizablefunctional groups can be directly attached to a nanohoop, or they can beindirectly attached through an optional linker.

In yet additional embodiments, the method can be an anionicpolymerization method. In such embodiments, polymerizable functionalgroups of the polymerizable nanohoop monomer(s) can be bound together toform a polymer backbone by reacting the polymerizable nanohoop monomerswith an initiator compound, such as an alkali metal or a covalent orionic metal compound (e.g., covalent or ionic metal amide, alkoxide,hydroxide, amine, phosphine, or cyanide), or an organometallic compound(e.g., an alkyl lithium or Grignard reagent). Polymerizable functionalgroups that can be used in such embodiments can include, but are notlimited to, acrylates, methacrylates (e.g., methyacrylate),methyacrylamides, stryenes, dienes (e.g., butadiene and derivativesthereof), vinyl acetate, n-vinylpyrrolidone, aldehydes, epoxides,acrylonitriles, and cyanoacrylates. Such polymerizable functional groupscan be directly attached to a nanohoop, or they can be indirectlyattached through an optional linker.

In yet additional embodiments, the method can be a condensationpolymerization method. In such embodiments, polymerizable functionalgroups of the polymerizable nanohoop monomer(s) can be bound together toform a polymer backbone by condensing the polymerizable nanohoopmonomers together under reaction conditions that promote condensation.Polymerizable functional groups that can be used in such embodiments caninclude, but are not limited to, alcohols, carboxylic acids, amines,ethers, and the like. Such polymerizable functional groups can bedirectly attached to a nanohoop, or they can be indirectly attachedthrough an optional linker.

In some embodiments, the method can further comprise making thepolymerizable nanohoop monomer. In some embodiments, the method canfurther comprise making a polymerizable nanohoop monomer that comprisesone or more “pre-installed” functional groups capable of undergoingpolymerization to provide a polymer backbone to which the nanohoop isattached. In such embodiments, the functional groups are “pre-installed”because they are installed as the nanohoop is made. In yet someadditional embodiments, the method can comprise modifying a nanohoopcompound with one or more functional groups capable of polymerizing toprovide the polymer backbone. In such embodiments, the nanohoop compoundis made first and then is functionalized to comprise the polymerizablefunctional group.

In some embodiments, the method comprises making a nanohoop monomercomprising a pre-installed polymerizable group. Such a method isdescribed in Scheme 3.

With reference to Scheme 3, two coupling partners (e.g., couplingpartners 300 and 302) can be coupled to one another using a transitionmetal-mediated cross-coupling reaction to provide polymerizable nanohoopmonomer precursor 304. In Scheme 1, coupling partner 300 comprises thepolymerizable functional group; however, the present disclosurecontemplates method embodiments wherein the polymerizable functionalgroup is attached to coupling partner 302. Rings A-E of couplingpartners 300 and 302 can be selected from any suitable aromatic group soas to provide nanohoops described herein. With reference to couplingpartner 302, each R independently can be a protecting group selectedfrom aliphatic protecting groups (e.g., lower alkyl, such as methyl) orsilyl protecting groups (e.g., TES, TMS, TBS, TBDPS, TIPS, and thelike). Aromatization of polymerizable nanohoop monomer precursor 304 topolymerizable nanohoop monomer 306 can take place by using a reductivearomatization method. Exemplary reagents and method embodiments formaking polymerizable nanohoop monomers comprising pre-installedpolymerizable functional groups are detailed in Schemes 4 and 5, below.

With reference to Scheme 4, a ROMP-reactive benzonorbornene unit was“pre-installed” into a CPP backbone. In particular, double nucleophilicaddition of (4-bromophenyl)lithium to norbornene-benzoquinone 400followed by in situ methylation of the resulting alkoxides yieldsdibromide 402. This curved intermediate can serve as a common couplingpartner for different-sized nanohoop monomer embodiments (e.g., nanohoopmonomer embodiments comprising n number of rings in the nanohoop).Coupling partner 404 is prepared by means of iterativediastereoselective nucleophilic additions (described in the Examplessection herein). Macrocycle 406 comprises 8 total phenylene andcyclohexadiene units and is obtained via dilute Suzuki-Miyauracross-coupling of dibromide 402 with bisboronate 404.

Reductive aromatization of 406 with sodium naphthalenide yieldspolymerizable nanohoop monomer 408.

Another exemplary method embodiment is detailed in Scheme 5.

With reference to Scheme 5, Suzuki-Miyaura cross-coupling of bisboronate500 and dibromide 402 yields macrocycle 502 comprising 10 (masked)phenylene units. Reductive aromatization of 502 yields polymerizablenanohoop monomer 504.

In some embodiments, the polymer embodiments disclosed herein can beused electronic devices, optoelectric devices, and other types ofdevices employing conjugated polymers. In some embodiments, polymerembodiments can be used as a graphene surrogate and thus can be used inapplications that typically employ graphene and/or graphene derivatives.In yet additional embodiments, polymer embodiments can be used as acomponent for sensor devices (e.g., devices that employ supramolecularsensing).

V. OVERVIEW OF SEVERAL EMBODIMENTS

Disclosed herein are embodiments of a polymer having a structureaccording to Formula I

wherein PB is a polymer backbone; TG is a terminating group; theoptional linker is selected from aliphatic, heteroaliphatic,haloaliphatic, haloheteroaliphatic, aromatic, or an organic functionalgroup; the nanohoop comprises six or more aromatic ring systems andwherein each aromatic ring is bound to at least two other rings of thenanohoop by two separate single covalent bonds positioned para, ortho,or meta relative to one another; m is an integer ranging from two orgreater; and q is an integer selected from 1 or 2.

In some embodiments, TG is an aromatic ring. In some such embodiments,the aromatic ring is a phenyl ring.

In any or all of the above embodiments, the optional linker is notpresent and PB is covalently attached to the nanohoop through two pointsof attachment.

In any or all of the above embodiments, PB is a five-membered ring andtwo adjacent carbon atoms of the five-membered ring are attached to twoadjacent carbon atoms of the nanohoop.

In any or all of the above embodiments, the optional linker is notpresent and PB is covalently attached to the nanohoop through one pointof attachment.

In any or all of the above embodiments, q is 2 and each PB is differentfrom the other. In any or all of the above embodiments, the polymer hasa structure according to Formula II

wherein each of rings A, B, C, D, and E independently are aromatic ringsystems; each R′ independently is a substituent other than hydrogen;each s independently is an integer selected from 0 to 10; and p is aninteger selected from 1 to 1000.

In any or all of the above embodiments, each of rings A, B, C, D, and Eindependently are aryl or heteroaryl.

In any or all of the above embodiments, each of rings A, B, C, D, and Eindependently are phenyl or pyridinyl.

In any or all of the above embodiments, each R′ independently isselected from aliphatic, heteroaliphatic, haloaliphatic, aromatic, or anorganic functional group.

In any or all of the above embodiments, the polymer has a structureaccording to Formula III or IV

wherein each R′ independently is a substituent other than hydrogen; eachs independently is an integer selected from 0 to 10; and p is an integerselected from 1 to 1000.

In any or all of the above embodiments, each R′ independently isselected from aliphatic, aryl, heteroaryl, halogen, anelectron-accepting group, an electron-donating group, or any combinationthereof.

In any or all of the above embodiments, the polymer is

Also disclosed are embodiments of a compound, having a structureaccording to Formula V

wherein:

PFG is a polymerizable functional group comprising a bicyclic structurecomprising at least one double bond;

the optional linker is selected from aliphatic, heteroaliphatic,haloaliphatic, haloheteroaliphatic, aromatic, or an organic functionalgroup;

the nanohoop comprises six or more aromatic ring systems and whereineach aromatic ring is bound to at least two other rings of the nanohoopby two separate single covalent bonds positioned para, ortho, or metarelative to one another; and

q is 1 or 2.

In some embodiments, the compound has a structure according to FormulaVII or VIII

wherein each R′ independently is a substituent other than hydrogen; eachs independently is an integer selected from 0 to 10; and p is an integerselected from 1 to 1000.

In any or all of the above embodiments, the compound is

Also disclosed herein are embodiments of a method, comprising exposingone or more polymerizable nanohoop monomers to conditions that promotering opening metathesis polymerization, reversibleaddition-fragmentation chain transfer, anionic polymerization, orcondensation polymerization between the one or more polymerizablenanohoop monomers to thereby provide a nanohoop-functionalized polymerwherein bonds are formed between polymerizable functional groups of theone or more polymerizable nanohoop monomers; wherein the one or morepolymerizable nanohoop monomers independently have a structure accordingto Formula V

wherein

each PFG independently is selected from a norbornene, an acrylate, amethacrylate, a methyacrylamide, a stryene, a diene, vinyl acetate,n-vinylpyrrolidone, an aldehyde, an epoxide, an acrylonitrile, acyanoacrylate, an alcohol, a carboxylic acid, an amine, or an ether;

the optional linker is selected from aliphatic, heteroaliphatic,haloaliphatic, haloheteroaliphatic, aromatic, or an organic functionalgroup;

the nanohoop comprises six or more aromatic ring systems and whereineach aromatic ring is bound to at least two other rings of the nanohoopby two separate single covalent bonds positioned para, ortho, or metarelative to one another; and

q is 1 or 2.

In some embodiments, the method comprising exposing the one or morepolymerizable nanohoop monomers to a ruthenium-based catalyst to promotea ring opening metathesis polymerization between the polymerizablefunctional groups of the one or more polymerizable nanohoop monomers andwherein the polymerizable nanohoop monomer has a structure according toFormula VII or VIII

wherein each R′ independently is a substituent other than hydrogen; eachs independently is an integer selected from 0 to 10; and p is an integerselected from 1 to 1000.

Also disclosed herein are embodiments of a method, comprising: couplingtogether two coupling partners using a transition metal-mediatedcross-coupling reaction to provide a polymerizable nanohoop monomerprecursor; and performing a reductive aromatization step with thepolymerizable nanohoop monomer precursor to provide a polymerizablenanohoop monomer having a Formula V

wherein

each PFG independently is selected from a norbornene, an acrylate, amethacrylate, a methyacrylamide, a stryene, a diene, vinyl acetate,n-vinylpyrrolidone, an aldehyde, an epoxide, an acrylonitrile, acyanoacrylate, an alcohol, a carboxylic acid, an amine, or an ether;

the optional linker is selected from aliphatic, heteroaliphatic,haloaliphatic, haloheteroaliphatic, aromatic, or an organic functionalgroup;

the nanohoop comprises six or more aromatic ring systems and whereineach aromatic ring is bound to at least two other rings of the nanohoopby two separate single covalent bonds positioned para, ortho, or metarelative to one another; and

q is 1 or 2.

VI. EXAMPLES

Commercially available materials were used without purification.Moisture- and oxygen-sensitive reactions were carried out in flame-driedglassware and under an inert atmosphere of purified nitrogen usingsyringe/septa technique. Tetrahydrofuran (THF), 1,4-dioxane, anddimethylformamide (DMF) were dried by filtration through aluminaaccording to the methods described by Grubbs. Thin Layer Chromatography(TLC) was performed using Sorbent Technologies Silica Gel XHT TLCplates. Developed plates were visualized using UV light at wavelengthsof 254 and 365 nm. Silica column chromatography was conducted withZeochem Zeoprep 60 Eco 40-63 μm silica gel. Automated flashchromatography was performed using a Biotage Isolera One. Recycling gelpermeation chromatography (GPC) was performed using a Japan AnalyticalIndustry LC-9101 preparative HPLC with JAIGEL-1 H/JAIGEL-2H columns inseries using CHCl₃. ¹H and ¹³C NMR spectra were recorded on a BrukerAvance III HD 500 MHz (¹H: 500 MHz, ¹³C: 126 MHz) NMR spectrometer. Allspectra were taken in CDCl₃, and the chemical shifts (δ) were reportedin parts per million (ppm) referenced to TMS (δ0.00 ppm) for ¹H NMR andresidual CHCl₃ (δ77.16 ppm) for ¹³C NMR. GPC for polymer molecularweight determination was performed on a TOSOH EcoSEC HLC-8320GPC in THFagainst polystyrene standards using refractive index measurements.Dynamic light scattering (DLS) was performed in THF using the defaultglobular protein model on a Wyatt Technology Mobius. UV-vis absorptionand fluorescence spectra were recorded in a 1 cm quartz cuvette on anAgilent Cary 100 spectrophotometer and a Horiba Jobin Yvon Fluoromax-4Fluorometer, respectively. Fluorescence quantum yields were measured inTHF using a Hamamatsu absolute photoluminescence quantum yieldmeasurement system. All absorption and fluorescence measurements werecarried out under ambient conditions. Mass spectrometry measurementswere carried out by the staff at the School of Chemical Sciences MassSpectrometry Laboratory at UIUC. For MALDI measurements,trans-2-[3-(4-tert-butylphenyI)-2-methyl-2-propenylidene]malononitrile(DCTB) was used as the matrix.

Example 1

A flame-dried flask was charged with 1,4-dibromobenzene (8.2 g, 34.8mmol, 3.00 equiv.), which was dissolved in THF (80 mL) and then cooledto −78° C. for 20 minutes. n-BuLi (15.8 mL, 24.8 mmol, 3.00 equiv.) wasadded dropwise. The reaction was stirred at −78° C. for 20 minutes,after which a solution of norbornene-benzoquinone 400 (2.00 g, 11.6mmol, 1.00 equiv.) in THF (8 mL) was added dropwise. The reaction wasstirred for 1 hour at −78° C. Methyl iodide (7.2 mL, 116.2 mmol, 10.00equiv.) and a few mL of DMF were added to the reaction, which wasstirred overnight at room temperature then quenched with water. The THFwas removed under reduced pressure, and the resulting solution wasextracted with ethyl acetate (3×). The combined organic layers werewashed with 5% aqueous LiCl (3×), water (2×), and brine (1×), then driedover sodium sulfate. Concentration under reduced pressure yielded solidproduct, which was filtered and washed with hexanes. Additional productwas obtained by purifying the filtrate via silica gel columnchromatography (0 to 8% ethyl acetate in hexanes) followed by a finalwash of product-containing fractions with hexanes. Combined yield was1.69 g (29%). ¹H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl₃): δ7.49-7.44 (m, 4H), 7.34-7.30 (m,4H), 6.87 (t, J=1.9 Hz, 2H), 5.92 (s, 2H), 3.50 (p, J=1.6 Hz, 2H), 3.15(s, 6H), 1.99 (dt, J=6.3, 1.6 Hz, 1H), 1.89 (dt, J=6.3, 1.7 Hz, 1H). ¹³CNMR (126 MHz, CDCl₃) δ153.8, 142.3, 142.2, 134.5, 131.5, 127.8, 121.5,75.9, 74.1, 52.8, 49.8. IR (neat): 2983.3, 2931.2, 2873.7, 1481.0,1392.1, 1299.1, 1070.9, 1007.4, 938.4, 823.3, 726.6, 681.9 cm⁻¹. HRMS(TOF MS EI+) (m/z): [M]⁺ calculated for C₂₅H₂₂Br₂O₂: 511.9987; found:511.9997. See FIGS. 17A and 17B for proton and carbon NMR spectra.

Example 2

A flame-dried flask was charged with dibromide 402 (300 mg, 0.583 mmol,1.00 equiv.), bisboronate 404 (487 mg, 0.642 mmol, 1.10 equiv.), andSPhos-Pd-G2 (42 mg, 0.058 mmol, 0.10 equiv.). The flask was evacuatedand backfilled with nitrogen for 5 cycles. Dry dioxane (195 mL) wassparged with nitrogen for 1 hr. A 2.00 M. aqueous solution of K₃PO₄ wassparged with nitrogen for 1 hr. Dioxane was added to the reaction flask,which was then heated to 80° C. 19.5 mL of K₃PO₄ solution was added. Thereaction was stirred overnight at 80° C. After the reaction was cooledto room temperature, the dioxane was removed under reduced pressure,then the resulting material was extracted with DCM (3×). The combinedorganic layers were washed with water (2×) and brine (1×), then driedover sodium sulfate, filtered through celite, and concentrated underreduced pressure. Silica gel column chromatography on the filtrate (6 to16% ethyl acetate in 50/50 DCM/hexanes) yielded 160 mg (29%). ¹H NMR(500 MHz, CDCl₃): δ7.55 (d, J=8.6 Hz, 4H), 7.51 (s, 4H), 7.50 (d, J=7.9Hz, 4H), 7.43 (d, J=8.7 Hz, 4H), 7.21 (d, J=8.6 Hz, 4H), 6.98 (t, J=1.8Hz, 2H), 6.14-6.06 (m, 10H), 3.79 (t, J=1.5 Hz, 2H), 3.48 (s, 6H), 3.40(s, 6H), 3.23 (s, 6H), 2.04 (d, 1 H), 1.97 (d, J=6.4 Hz, 1 H). ¹³C NMR(126 MHz, CDCl₃) δ154.11, 143.35, 143.19, 142.79, 140.82, 139.61,139.54, 134.87, 133.60, 133.44, 132.83, 132.70, 127.13, 126.82, 126.38,126.28, 126.26, 77.61, 74.60, 74.00, 73.79, 53.03, 52.15, 51.78, 49.68.IR (neat): 2934.9, 2897.5, 2821.1, 1712.9, 1491.7, 1448.9, 1397.2,1175.2, 1073.9, 946.7, 818.3 cm⁻¹. HRMS (TOF MS EI+) (m/z): [M]⁺calculated for C₅₉H₅₄O₆: 858.3920; found: 858.3954. See FIGS. 17C and17D for proton and carbon NMR spectra.

Example 3

A 0.5 M. sodium naphthalenide solution was prepared by sonicating sodiumand naphthalene in THF in a flame-dried flask, then stirring thesolution overnight. Macrocycle 406 (83 mg, 0.097 mmol, 1.00 equiv.) wasdispersed in THF in a flame-dried flask and stirred at -78 ° C. for 30min. Sodium naphthalenide (>2.90 mL, 1.45 mmol, 15.00 equiv.) was addeddropwise to the reaction flask until the mixture was brown. The reactionwas stirred for 30 minutes and then quenched with dropwise addition of 1M. iodine solution in THF until orange. Sodium thiosulfate was addeduntil the orange color dissipated, and the reaction was warmed to roomtemperature. THF was removed under reduced pressure, and the resultingsolution was extracted with DCM (3×). The combined organic layers werewashed with water (2×) and brine (1×), then dried over sodium sulfateand concentrated under reduced pressure. Automated silica gel columnchromatography (5 to 40% DCM in hexanes) yielded 55 mg 408 (85%). ¹H NMR(500 MHz, CDCl₃): δ (ppm) 7.47 (overlapping, 24H), 7.28 (d, J=7.9 Hz,4H), 7.01 (t, J=1.9 Hz, 2H), 6.53 (s, 2H), 4.38 (t, J=1.9 Hz, 2H), 2.45(dt, J=7.2, 1.6 Hz, 1H), 2.28 (d, J=7.4 Hz, 1H). ¹³C NMR (126 MHz,CDCl₃) δ148.59, 143.15, 139.08, 138.25, 138.05, 137.91, 137.89, 137.86,137.80, 132.84, 129.05, 69.44, 49.98. IR (neat): 3021.8, 1889.6, 1582.9,1480.7, 1388.8, 1256.9, 998.7, 942.1, 809.7, 723.2 cm⁻¹. HRMS (TOF MSEI+) (m/z): [M]⁺ calculated for C₅₃H₃₆: 672.2817; found: 672.2833. SeeFIGS. 18A and 18B for proton and carbon NMR spectra.

Example 4

To a slurry of sodium hydride (220 mg, 5.4 mmol, 1.30 equiv.) in 10 mLTHF was added a solution of ketone 508 (1.80 g, 4.1 mmol, 1.00 equiv.)in 10 mL THF at -78° C. The reaction mixture was stirred for 2 hr at-78° C. In a separate flask, bromochloride 506 (2.52 g, 6.2 mmol, 1.50equiv.) was dissolved in 20 mL THF. This solution was cooled to -78° C.,then n-BuLi (2.4 mL, 5.8 mmol, 1.40 equiv.) was added dropwise and thereaction was stirred for 30 min. This mixture was then transferred tothe slurry containing the deprotonated ketone. The resulting mixture wasstirred for 2 hr, at which time Mel (2.6 mL, 4.1 mmol, 10.00 equiv.) anddry DMF (5 mL) were added. The reaction was allowed to warm to roomtemperature overnight. The reaction was quenched with water andextracted with diethyl ether (3×). The combined organic layers werewashed with 5% aqueous LiCI (3×), water (2×), and brine (1×), then driedover sodium sulfate and concentrated under reduced pressure. Thematerial was sonicated with hexanes until solid formed, then it wasfiltered and washed with hexanes. The product was purified further byautomated silica gel chromatography in 5 to 12% ethyl acetate inhexanes. 1.50 g were collected (46%). ¹H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl₃):δ7.37-7.24 (overlapping, 16H), 6.11 (d, J=10.2 Hz, 4H), 6.07 (s, 4H),6.04 (d, J=10.4 Hz, 4H), 3.43-3.40 (overlapping, 18H). ¹³C NMR (126 MHz,CDCl₃) δ143.09, 142.69, 142.20, 133.84, 133.48, 133.46, 133.12, 128.61,127.60, 126.21, 126.13, 77.36, 74.70, 74.58, 52.14, 52.13, 52.12. IR(neat): 2939.8, 2819.0, 1489.0, 1452.1, 1403.3, 1228.2, 1179.3, 1070.6,1013.2, 947.7, 820.3, 729.2, 664.0 cm⁻¹. HRMS (TOF MS EI+) (m/z): [M]⁺calculated for C₄₈H₄₆Cl₂O₆: 788.2671; found: 788.2695. See FIGS. 19A and19B for proton and carbon NMR spectra.

Example 5

Potassium acetate (373 mg, 3.8 mmol, 6.00 equiv.) was flame-dried in aflask and cooled under nitrogen. Ground B₂pin₂ (482 mg, 1.9 mmol, 3.00equiv.), dichloride 510 (500 mg, 0.6 mmol, 1.00 equiv.), Pd(OAc)₂ (14mg, 0.1 mmol, 0.10 equiv.), and SPhos (68 mg, 0.2 mmol, 0.26 equiv.)were added to the flask, which was then evacuated and backfilled withnitrogen for 5 cycles. The flask was sealed with a septum and purgedwith nitrogen for 1 hr. Dry dioxane (5 mL) was sparged with nitrogen for1 hr then added to reaction flask. The reaction was heated to 80° C.,then stirred overnight. After the reaction was cooled to roomtemperature, the mixture was filtered through a plug of celite, and thefiltrate was concentrated under reduced pressure.

The material was sonicated with methanol and filtered. The product wasthen run through a very short silica plug using ethyl acetate andconcentrated again to yield 430 mg (70%). ¹H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl₃): δ7.75(d, J=8.0 Hz, 4H), 7.40 (d, J=8.3 Hz, 4H), 7.34 (s, 8H), 6.10-6.06 (m,12H), 3.42 (m, 18H), 1.33 (s, 24H). ¹³C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl₃) δ146.63,142.94, 142.80, 135.09, 133.54, 133.48, 133.44, 133.27, 126.20, 126.13,125.45, 83.90, 75.04, 74.79, 74.74, 52.10, 52.08, 25.01, 24.97. IR(neat): 2979.9, 2938.2, 2896.7, 2821.6, 1501.1, 1489.4, 1450.9, 1403.2,1358.1, 1179.3, 1079.3, 1013.8, 948.7, 826.4, 757.3, 657.2 cm⁻¹. HRMS(FTMS ESI) (m/z): [M⁺ Na]+calculated for C₆₀H₇₀B₂O₁₀Na: 995.5047; found:995.5031. See FIGS. 19C and 19D for proton and carbon NMR spectra.

p Example 6

A flame-dried flask was charged with dibromide 402 (720 mg, 1.40 mmol,1.00 equiv.), bisboronate 500 (1.43 g, 1.47 mmol, 1.05 equiv.), andSPhos-Pd-G2 (101 mg, 0.14 mmol, 0.10 equiv.). The flask was evacuatedand backfilled with nitrogen for 5 cycles. The flask was then purgedwith nitrogen. A 2.00 M. aqueous solution of K₃PO₄ was sparged withnitrogen for 1 hr. Dioxane (470 mL) was added to the reaction flask viacannulation, and the solution was sparged for 20 min. before beingheated to 80° C. for 10 min. 47 mL of K₃PO₄ solution was added, and thereaction was stirred for 30 min. at 80° C. After the reaction was cooledto room temperature, the dioxane was removed under reduced pressure,then the resulting material was filtered through a celite pad with DCMand water. The filtrate was extracted with DCM (3×). The combinedorganic layers were washed with water (2×) and brine (1×), then driedover sodium sulfate and concentrated under reduced pressure. Thematerial was purified by automated silica gel column chromatography (0to 14% ethyl acetate in DCM), then washed with acetone and filtered,yielding 415 mg (28%). ¹H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl₃): δ7.43-7.35 (overlapping,24H), 6.96 (s, 2H), 6.17-6.14 (overlapping, 8H), 6.07 (m, 4H), 6.00 (s,2H), 3.73 (s, 2H), 3.44 (s, 6H), 3.38 (s, 6H), 3.37 (s, 6H), 3.20 (s,6H), 2.17 (d, J=6.0 1H), 2.10 (d, J=6.2 Hz, 1H). ¹³C NMR (126 MHz,CDCl₃) δ154.21, 143.26, 143.05, 142.97, 142.47, 141.92, 140.42, 140.37,134.78, 134.01, 133.85, 133.23, 133.02, 132.86, 127.35, 127.25, 126.77,126.48, 126.29, 126.27, 77.02, 75.00, 74.52, 74.19, 73.96, 52.98, 52.18,52.06, 50.03. IR (neat): 2978.9, 2936.2, 2896.6, 2821.4, 1608.8, 1490.1,1450.6, 1403.0, 1358.2, 1173.4, 1072.8, 1013.7, 948.0, 822.2, 656.74cm⁻¹. HRMS (TOF MS EI+) (m/z): [M+Na]⁺ calculated for C₇₃H₆₈O₈Na:1095.4812; found: 1095.4840. See FIGS. 19E and 19F for proton and carbonNMR spectra.

Example 7

A 0.5 M. sodium naphthalenide solution was prepared by sonicating sodiumand naphthalene in THF in a flame-dried flask, then stirring thesolution overnight. Macrocycle 502 (395 mg, 0.368 mmol, 1.00 equiv.) wasdispersed in THF in a flame-dried flask and stirred at −78° C. for 30min. Sodium naphthalenide (>11.0 mL, 5.52 mmol, 15.00 equiv.) was addeddropwise to the reaction flask until the mixture was brown. The reactionwas stirred for 20 minutes and then quenched with dropwise addition of 1M. iodine solution in THF until orange. Sodium thiosulfate was addeduntil the orange color dissipated, and the reaction was warmed to roomtemperature. The resulting solution was extracted with DCM (3×). Thecombined organic layers were washed with water (2×) and brine (1×), thendried over sodium sulfate and concentrated under reduced pressure. Thematerial was adsorbed on silica and purified by automated silica gelcolumn chromatography (15-35% DCM in hexanes), yielding 229 mg (75%). ¹HNMR (500 MHz, CDCl₃): δ7.56 (overlapping, 32H), 7.36 (d, J=8.2 Hz, 4H),7.05 (t, J=1.7 Hz, 2H), 6.65 (s, 2H), 4.37 (s, 2H), 2.45 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 2.31 (d, J=7.3 Hz, 1 H). ¹³C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl₃) δ148.72, 143.11,139.27, 138.26, 138.19, 138.17, 138.15, 133.07, 128.40, 128.01, 127.40,127.37, 127.35, 127.24, 127.20, 69.27, 49.76. IR (neat): 3021.3, 1895.4,1589.7, 1479.3, 1386.6, 1000.2, 905.4, 805.7, 730.6 cm⁻¹. HRMS (TOF MSEI+) (m/z): [M]⁺ calculated for C₆₅H₄₄: 824.3443; found: 824.3467. SeeFIGS. 20A and 20B for proton and carbon NMR spectra.

Example 8

Before polymerization, each monomer was characterized using singlecrystal X-ray crystallography in addition to UV-vis absorbance andfluorescence spectroscopy. X-ray crystallography revealed thatpolymerizable nanohoop monomer 408 crystallized with the norbornene unitdisordered over two positions, whereas polymerizable nanohoop monomer504 crystallized with the norbornene alkene exclusively oriented towardthe center of the macrocycle. The alkene bond angles in both monomerswere between 107° and 110° (FIG. 1). polymerizable nanohoop monomer 408and polymerizable nanohoop monomer 504 exhibit nearly identicalcharacteristics to the corresponding unsubstituted CPPs in terms of bothabsorbance and emission (see FIG. 2 and FIG. 3). In underivatized CPPs,both extinction coefficient and quantum yield increase as the number ofbenzene rings increases, and this size-dependent trend holds true forpolymerizable nanohoop monomer 408 and polymerizable nanohoop monomer504 as well (see FIGS. 4A and 4B). Extinction coefficients were found tobe 1.3×10⁵ L·mol⁻¹cm⁻¹ and 1.5×10⁵ L·mol⁻¹cm⁻¹ for polymerizablenanohoop monomer 408 and polymerizable nanohoop monomer 504,respectively.

Example 9

In this example, a general method for making a polymer embodiment isdescribed. As a general procedure, a polymerizable nanohoop monomer isadded to a small vial with a stir bar, placed under N₂, then dissolvedin dry THF. A solution of bromopyridyl Grubbs G3 in THF is quickly addedto the vial via syringe, and the reaction is stirred for 30 minutes oruntil all monomer is consumed. The reaction is quenched with ethyl vinylether, and the material is precipitated from cold methanol. The polymeris collected by vacuum filtration.

In a representative example, polymerizable nanohoop monomer 408 wasadded to a small vial with a stir bar, placed under N₂, then dissolvedin dry THF. A solution of bromopyridyl Grubbs G3 in THF was quicklyadded to the vial via syringe, and the reaction was stirred until allmonomer is consumed. The reaction was quenched with ethyl vinyl ether,and the material was precipitated from cold methanol. The polymer(referred to herein as “poly[8]CPP”) was collected by vacuum filtration.See FIG. 21A for the corresponding proton NMR spectrum.

In another representative example, polymerizable nanohoop monomer 504was added to a small vial with a stir bar, placed under N₂, thendissolved in dry THF. A solution of bromopyridyl Grubbs G3 in THF wasquickly added to the vial via syringe, and the reaction was stirreduntil all monomer is consumed. The reaction was quenched with ethylvinyl ether, and the material was precipitated from cold methanol. Thepolymer (referred to herein as “poly[10]CPP”) was collected by vacuumfiltration. See FIG. 21B for the corresponding carbon NMR spectrum

For the polymers obtained from polymerizable nanohoop monomers 408 and504, dispersity values around 1.3 according to gel permeationchromatography (GPC) analysis (Table 1). The polymers were well-solublein common organic solvents such as chloroform and THF, in stark contrastto linear phenylenes which require solubilizing side chains. ¹H NMRspectra of the polymers show broad multiplets characteristic ofsubstituted [8]CPP and [10]CPP (at 7.48 and 7.55 ppm, respectively) andextremely broad/flat peaks in the alkyl and alkene regions, suggestingthat the polymers, at least in some embodiments, are not stereoregularand likely contain a mix of cis and trans alkenes. In situ NMRspectroscopy revealed that both monomers are consumed at approximatelythe same rate (see FIGS. 5A and 5B). To probe the living nature ofCPP-NB polymerization, polymerizable nanohoop monomer 408 waspolymerized over a range of monomer-to-initiator ratios. GPC and dynamiclight scattering (DLS) analysis of poly[8]CPP samples revealed a lineartrend between monomer-to-initiator ratio and polymer molecular weight(see FIG. 6 and Table 1). These results indicate that not only can CPPsbe kept intact throughout ROMP, but they can be polymerized in a livingfashion.

To study the absolute molecular weight distributions of these polymers,several poly-CPP samples were analyzed by matrix-assisted laserdesorption ionization (MALDI) mass spectrometry (see FIG. 7). In someembodiments, the wide range of polymer chain lengths present in thesamples precluded quantitative analysis of the spectra; however, theuniform spacing between peaks corresponding with the monomer masses—673Da for polymerizable nanohoop monomer 408 and 825 Da for polymerizablenanohoop monomer 504 —further confirmed formation of the desired polymerstructures with intact CPP units. Though the upper limits for achievablepoly-CPP molecular weights were not tested in this example, MALDI peakscorresponding to polymer chains containing 50 or more repeat units wereobserved.

TABLE 1 GPC and DLS characterization of representative poly-CPP samples.Polymerizations were conducted using 10-30 mg monomer, and yields weretypically quantitative. GPC Analysis DLS Analysis Sample Identity M_(w)(Da) Ð (M_(w)/M_(n)) M_(w) (Da) R_(h) (nm) Dispersity poly[8]CPP 1,3001.24 4,100 1.1 47% poly[8]CPP 7,800 1.30 13,100 1.8 24% poly[8]CPP 9,0001.49 17,100 2.0 25% poly[8]CPP 13,000 1.33 23,600 2.3 25% poly[8]CPP19,300 1.63 38,600 2.9 15% 3:1 poly[8]CPP-random-[10]CPP 13,600 1.3221,000 2.2 13% 1:1 poly[8]CPP-random-[10]CPP 17,600 1.34 27,500 2.5 21%1:1 poly[8]CPP-random-[10]CPP 14,600 1.52 30,000 2.5 24% 1:3poly[8]CPP-random-[10]CPP 17,400 1.33 24,500 2.3 12% poly[10]CPP 16,9001.27 23,600 2.3 20%

Example 10

In this example, the optical properties of polymer were evaluated. Inparticular, THF solutions of poly[8]CPP and poly[10]CPP were examinedusing UV-vis absorption and fluorescence spectroscopy. Absorbance andemission spectra of the homopolymers, like those of the monomers, showlittle change from the spectra of the parent CPPs (see FIGS. 2 and 3).Fluorescence quantum yields were determined to be 27% and 63%.

The tunability of the fluorescence emission of poly-CPPs also wasevaluated. In one example, polymerizable nanohoop monomer 408 andpolymerizable nanohoop monomer 504 units were combined in one polymer todetermine if this would produce an additive emission profile withfeatures from both fluorophores. A copolymer was prepared by premixingequimolar amounts of polymerizable nanohoop monomer 408 andpolymerizable nanohoop monomer 504 before addition of initiator to thereaction. Incorporation of both units in the resultant polymer,poly[8]CPP-random-[10]CPP, was confirmed by ¹H NMR and emissionintensity analysis (see FIGS. 8 and 9, respectively). In thisembodiment, the fluorescence emission of this polymer closely resembledthe emission of polymerizable nanohoop monomer 408 with a major peak at529 nm (see FIG. 10). Only a slight shoulder extending from about 415 to520 nm revealed any contribution from the polymerizable nanohoop monomer504 units to the overall emission profile. For comparison, a blend ofpoly[8]CPP and poly[10]CPP homopolymers in THF was prepared. Thispoly[8]CPP/poly[10]CPP blend displays clear emission contributions fromboth types of polymers, indicating that the two types of homopolymersare electronically independent in the blend. In contrast, the unexpectedemission of copolymerized polymerizable nanohoop monomer 408 andpolymerizable nanohoop monomer 504 suggests that when these hoops arecovalently linked in close proximity, interactions emerge that are notobserved among individual CPP molecules or blended homopolymers. Inpoly[8]CPP-random-[10]CPP, the fluorescence of the smaller hoopsdominates the overall emission spectrum, indicating energy transferbetween the hoop units. A related effect was recently observed in acomparative heterocatenane composed of [9]CPP and [12]CPP. Theobservance of energy transfer in CPP copolymers suggests that CPP unitscan play a role in advanced emissive materials composed of multiplefluorophores.

Example 11

In this example, fluorescence quenching experiments were used toinvestigate the host-guest interactions of poly-CPPs with C₆₀, usingsolutions of the polymers in toluene. Poly[10]CPP exhibits thecharacteristic fluorescence quenching of [10]CPP by C₆₀ (see FIG. 11),whereas poly[8]CPP, like [8]CPP, has no inherent affinity for C₆₀ andundergoes only minor dynamic quenching from C₆₀ addition (see FIG. 12).Upon C₆₀ addition to the poly[8]CPP/poly[10]CPP blend, the region of theemission spectrum attributed to the contribution from poly[10]CPP, fromaround 420 nm to 500 nm, undergoes the greatest quenching effect fromC₆₀, while the emission peak at 528 nm attributed to the emissioncontribution from poly[8]CPP persists (see FIG. 13A). The emissionmaximum of the blend can be gradually shifted to longer wavelengths byselective quenching of the emission of poly[10]CPP by C₆₀. Aliquots ofC₆₀ were then added to a solution of poly[8]CPP-random-[10]CPP, whichresulted in a gradual fluorescence quenching across the entire spectrum(see FIG. 13B). Very similar emission and quenching was observed incopolymer samples with 3:1 and 1:3 molar ratios of polymerizablenanohoop monomer 408 and polymerizable nanohoop monomer 504 (see FIGS. 8and 9). The difference in quenching between the poly[8]CPP/poly[10]CPPblend and poly[8]CPP-random-[10]CPP reinforces that the close covalentlinkage of multiple sizes of CPPs is responsible for these emergentproperties.

Example 12

In this example, representative polymers were characterized usingdifferent characterization techniques. Results are presented below.

X-Ray Crystallography Data

Single crystals suitable for crystallographic analysis were grown fromslow evaporation of a solution of 402 in DCM/hexanes and slow diffusionof pentane into solutions of 408 and 504 in THF. Crystal data has beendeposited to the Cambridge Crystallographic Database with CCDC numbers1949617, 1949616, and 1949615.

Diffraction intensities for 402, 408 and 504 were collected at 173 K ona Bruker Apex2 CCD diffractometer using CuKα radiation, λ=1.54178 Å.Space groups were determined based on systematic absences. Absorptioncorrections were applied by SADABS. Structures were solved by directmethods and Fourier techniques and refined on F² using full matrixleast-squares procedures. All non-H atoms were refined with anisotropicthermal parameters. H atoms in all structures were refined in calculatedpositions in a rigid group model. The structure of 408 was determined innon-centrosymmetrical space group symmetry R3c, but not in possiblecentro-symmetrical space group R-3c. The refinement innon-centrosymmetrical space group symmetry R3c shown that the Flackparameter is close to zero, but not to 0.5 as could be expected if thecentro-symmetrical space group R-3c is correct. Crystals of 408 areformed as thin strips and give very weak X-ray diffraction at highangles. Even using a strong Incoatec IμS Cu source for 408 it waspossible to collect data only up to 2 θ_(max)=98.44°. However thecollected data provide an appropriate number of measured reflections pera number of refined parameters, 4073/472. In both 408 and 504 structuressolvent pentane molecules fill out empty space in the packing and in thehoops and are highly disordered. These disordered solvent molecules weretreated by SQUEEZE. The corrections of the X-ray data by SQUEEZE are 760and 480 electron/cell; the required values are 756 and 336 electron/cellfor eighteen and eight pentane molecules in the full unit cells,respectively in 408 and 504. The five-member ring in 408 is disorderedover two positions with opposite orientations as well. Resolution for408 and 504 structures is relatively low due to a lot of disorderedfragments in the structures and weak X-ray diffraction at high angles,but the found X-ray structures clearly shown the structure of the hoopsin these compounds. All calculations were performed by the BrukerSHELXL-2014 package.

Crystallographic Data for 402: C₂₅H₂₂Br₂O₂, M=514.24, 0.11×0.08×0.06 mm,T=173(2) K, Monoclinic, space group P2₁/c, a=12.3702(5) Å, b =15.2429(6)Å, c=12.0344(4) Å, β=112.703(1)°, V=2093.36(14) Å3, Z=4, D_(c)=1.632Mg/m3, μ(Cu)=5.058 mm-1, F(000)=1032, 2 θ_(max)=133.31°, 16491reflections, 3694 independent reflections [R_(int)=0.0496], R1=0.0313,wR2=0.0848 and GOF=1.044 for 3694 reflections (262 parameters) with 1>2σ(1), R1=0.0344, wR2=0.0870 and GOF=1.044 for all reflections, max/minresidual electron density +0.573/−0.507 eÅ⁻³. See FIG. 14.

Crystallographic Data for 408: C₅₈H₄₈, C₅₃H₃₆·(C₅H₁₂), M=744.96,0.09×0.08×0.01 mm, T=173(2) K, Trigonal, space group R3c, a=16.3432(5)Å, b=16.3432(5) Å, c=80.413(4) Å, V=18600.8(14) Å3, Z=18, D_(c)=1.197Mg/m3, μ(Cu)=0.508 mm-1, F(000)=7128, 2 θ_(max)=98.44°, 25725reflections, 4073 independent reflections [R_(int)=0.0604], R1=0.0534,wR2=0.1340 and GOF=1.085 for 4073 reflections (472 parameters) with 1>2σ(1), R¹=0.0688, wR2 =0.1424 and GOF=1.087 for all reflections, max/minresidual electron density +0.140/−0.137 eÅ⁻³. See FIG. 15.

Crystallographic Data for 504: C₇₅H₆₈, C₆₅H₄₄·2(C₅H₁₂), M=969.29,0.11×0.08×0.06 mm, T=173(2) K, Monoclinic, space group P2₁/c,a=6.5747(3) Å, b =28.3155(16) Å, c=32.6239(17) A, β=91.334(4)°,V=6071.8(5) Å3, Z=4, D_(c)=1.060 Mg/m3, μ(Cu)=0.447 mm-1, F(000)=2072, 2θ_(max)=133.40°, 46166 reflections, 10685 independent reflections[R_(int)=0.0443], R1=0.0507, wR2=0.1396 and GOF=1.051 for 10685reflections (586 parameters) with 1>2 σ(1), R1=0.0617, wR2=0.1461 andGOF=1.051 for all reflections, max/min residual electron density+0.391/−0.198 eÅ⁻³. See FIG. 16.

Kinetics

The 90° pulse width was calibrated for both monomers, and a 90° pulsewidth of 11.25 μs at −11.43 dB was used. Longitudinal relaxation timeconstants (T1) for both monomers were determined by inversion-recoveryto be approximately 1 s, so a relaxation delay of 5 s was used for allacquisitions. Kinetic experiments were conducted in THF-d₈ withconcentrations of 32 mM monomer, 3.2 mM Grubbs G3 initiator, andapproximately 21 mM dimethyl sulfone (δ2.86 ppm) as an internalstandard. A proton spectrum was acquired for each sample before GrubbsG3 addition to determine the initial amount of monomer relative todimethyl sulfone. Each sample was kept in an ice bath during Grubbs G3addition then shaken and inserted into the NMR spectrometer. Spectrawere acquired every 3 minutes until the polymerization was complete. Allspectra were acquired at 10° C. Peaks at 4.32 ppm and 4.33 ppm were usedto track consumption over time of polymerizable nanohoop monomer 408 andpolymerizable nanohoop monomer 504, respectively. Toward the end of thepolymerizations, however, the baseline around these peaks was no longerflat, interfering with accurate integration. Therefore, line fittingexcluded data points after these times although small amounts of monomerremained. Results of conversion of the monomers to polymers over timeare shown in FIGS. 5A and 5B.

In view of the many possible embodiments to which the principles of thepresent disclosure may be applied, it should be recognized that theillustrated embodiments are only preferred examples and should not betaken as limiting. Rather, the scope is defined by the following claims.We therefore claim as our invention all that comes within the scope andspirit of these claims.

We claim:
 1. A polymer having a structure according to Formula I

wherein PB is a polymer backbone; TG is a terminating group; theoptional linker is selected from aliphatic, heteroaliphatic,haloaliphatic, haloheteroaliphatic, aromatic, or an organic functionalgroup; the nanohoop comprises six or more aromatic ring systems andwherein each aromatic ring is bound to at least two other rings of thenanohoop by two separate single covalent bonds positioned para, ortho,or meta relative to one another; m is an integer ranging from two orgreater; and q is an integer selected from 1 or
 2. 2. The polymer ofclaim 1, wherein TG is an aromatic ring.
 3. The polymer of claim 2,wherein the aromatic ring is a phenyl ring.
 4. The polymer of claim 1,wherein the optional linker is not present and PB is covalently attachedto the nanohoop through two points of attachment.
 5. The polymer ofclaim 4, wherein PB is a five-membered ring and two adjacent carbonatoms of the five-membered ring are attached to two adjacent carbonatoms of the nanohoop.
 6. The polymer of claim 1, wherein the optionallinker is not present and PB is covalently attached to the nanohoopthrough one point of attachment.
 7. The polymer of claim 1, wherein q is2 and each PB is different from the other.
 8. The polymer of claim 1,wherein the polymer has a structure according to Formula II

wherein each of rings A, B, C, D, and E independently are aromatic ringsystems; each R′ independently is a substituent other than hydrogen;each s independently is an integer selected from 0 to 10; and p is aninteger selected from 1 to
 1000. 9. The polymer of claim 8, wherein eachof rings A, B, C, D, and E independently are aryl or heteroaryl.
 10. Thepolymer of claim 8, wherein each of rings A, B, C, D, and Eindependently are phenyl or pyridinyl.
 11. The polymer of claim 8,wherein each R′ independently is selected from aliphatic,heteroaliphatic, haloaliphatic, aromatic, or an organic functionalgroup.
 12. The polymer of claim 1, wherein the polymer has a structureaccording to Formula III or IV

wherein each R′ independently is a substituent other than hydrogen; eachs independently is an integer selected from 0 to 10; and p is an integerselected from 1 to
 1000. 13. The polymer of claim 12, wherein each R′independently is selected from aliphatic, aryl, heteroaryl, halogen, anelectron-accepting group, an electron-donating group, or any combinationthereof.
 14. The polymer of claim 1, wherein the polymer is


15. A compound, having a structure according to Formula V

wherein: PFG is a polymerizable functional group comprising a bicyclicstructure comprising at least one double bond; the optional linker isselected from aliphatic, heteroaliphatic, haloaliphatic,haloheteroaliphatic, aromatic, or an organic functional group; thenanohoop comprises six or more aromatic ring systems and wherein eacharomatic ring is bound to at least two other rings of the nanohoop bytwo separate single covalent bonds positioned para, ortho, or metarelative to one another; and q is 1 or
 2. 16. The compound of claim 15having a structure according to Formula VII or VIII

wherein each R′ independently is a substituent other than hydrogen; eachs independently is an integer selected from 0 to 10; and p is an integerselected from 1 to
 1000. 17. The compound of claim 15, wherein thecompound is


18. A method, comprising exposing one or more polymerizable nanohoopmonomers to conditions that promote ring opening metathesispolymerization, reversible addition-fragmentation chain transfer,anionic polymerization, or condensation polymerization between the oneor more polymerizable nanohoop monomers to thereby provide thenanohoop-functionalized polymer according to claim 1, wherein bonds areformed between polymerizable functional groups of the one or morepolymerizable nanohoop monomers; wherein the one or more polymerizablenanohoop monomers independently have a structure according to Formula V

wherein each PFG independently is selected from a norbornene, anacrylate, a methacrylate, a methyacrylamide, a stryene, a diene, vinylacetate, n-vinylpyrrolidone, an aldehyde, an epoxide, an acrylonitrile,a cyanoacrylate, an alcohol, a carboxylic acid, an amine, or an ether;the optional linker is selected from aliphatic, heteroaliphatic,haloaliphatic, haloheteroaliphatic, aromatic, or an organic functionalgroup; the nanohoop comprises six or more aromatic ring systems andwherein each aromatic ring is bound to at least two other rings of thenanohoop by two separate single covalent bonds positioned para, ortho,or meta relative to one another; and q is 1 or
 2. 19. The method ofclaim 18, wherein the method comprising exposing the one or morepolymerizable nanohoop monomers to a ruthenium-based catalyst to promotea ring opening metathesis polymerization between the polymerizablefunctional groups of the one or more polymerizable nanohoop monomers andwherein the polymerizable nanohoop monomer has a structure according toFormula VII or VIII

wherein each R′ independently is a substituent other than hydrogen; eachs independently is an integer selected from 0 to 10; and p is an integerselected from 1 to
 1000. 20. A method, comprising: coupling together twocoupling partners using a transition metal-mediated cross-couplingreaction to provide a polymerizable nanohoop monomer precursor; andperforming a reductive aromatization step with the polymerizablenanohoop monomer precursor to provide a polymerizable nanohoop monomerhaving a Formula V

wherein each PFG independently is selected from a norbornene, anacrylate, a methacrylate, a methyacrylamide, a stryene, a diene, vinylacetate, n-vinylpyrrolidone, an aldehyde, an epoxide, an acrylonitrile,a cyanoacrylate, an alcohol, a carboxylic acid, an amine, or an ether;the optional linker is selected from aliphatic, heteroaliphatic,haloaliphatic, haloheteroaliphatic, aromatic, or an organic functionalgroup; the nanohoop comprises six or more aromatic ring systems andwherein each aromatic ring is bound to at least two other rings of thenanohoop by two separate single covalent bonds positioned para, ortho,or meta relative to one another; and q is 1 or 2.